Games come and go, but DCC is still my jam. The game has that "fun factor" to it, where you get emergent play through the tables, your actions, spending lock, and random chance. This beats 5E for me eac hand every time, and even games like Nimble. The character sheets are far easier: you are not micromanaging a build, there is no multiclassing, and the zine culture ensures I have a wealth of adventures, classes, spells, and other material for my worlds and adventures.
The game is designed around table play, conventions, and making each class fun. Some 5E classes are just not fun to play. Every class in DCC is fun, even the cleric. I get a blast out of playing them, and they are awesome. There is something to a game in which the designers ask, "How is this class fun?"
Many games miss that, put the OSR too high on a pedestal, and don't think of "fun first."
I appreciate the attention to detail at Goodman Games. Watch any of their videos about their crowdfunding projects, and you'll see them talking about their boxes, paper quality, art, presentation, cover artists, and a commitment to quality and to getting it right. Some say Joseph Goodman comes across as a bit slick, like a guy who runs a used car lot, but I see someone who genuinely cares about what they ship every day, what goes out the door, how they look as a company, and their values. He is one of the good guys left in the hobby, easily on par with the crew at Troll Lord Games.
And DCC is fun. It stays out of the way. The game isn't about the rules; it is about the fun they can deliver. I think this is where 5E lost its way, the game is too focused on character power, loading characters up like over-decorated Christmas trees full of ornaments and flocking, and 5E characters are heavy and bloated - nobody is asking "is this power any fun at the table?" You will get a poorly-designed subclass you want to take, it will give you a power that is essentially a save modifier or some other minor stat adjustment, and it isn't any fun! It does nothing. The power just adds another paragraph to an already overloaded character sheet.
75% of the junk 5E throws at you is not fun, has little use at the table, and it is just another "thing to have." This is the collector's mentality, but brought to character sheets.
There is no power or ability in a DCC character that I don't use during play. 95% of them are useful and fun. The game drills down on the fun of the designs, makes them iconic, and it does not waste your time with fluff and pointless powers that you need but never use.
And DDC is weird, and it has managed to stay in the realm of strangeness even after 100 adventures. I get the feeling D&D has been stuck in its product identity IP for decades now, and can't escape it. Blah blah blah, another mind flayer with a displacer beast. The drow. A beholder. The githyanki are back with a cloaker. It is funny that all these "strange monsters" were intended to be "things no player has seen before" in the original Greyhawk campaign, and here we are, 50 years later, enshrining them on a pedestal as "definitive fantasy gaming."
See all those monsters on the DCC module covers? Those are the same thing. Strange monsters no one has seen before. Only in DCC do they not enshrine them, make them part of the product identity, and try to sell you nostalgia with them. One and done, and they move on to the next strange beast.
I am sick of the D&D product identity, and the team at Wizards is not committed to doing much of anything new. They are a nostalgia strip mine at this point. The current team does not have the ability to write a new adventure on the level of The Tomb of Horrors.
They do not have the commitment to quality.
Nor do they prioritize imagination and new things.
And they do not design for fun.
While Goodman Games & DCC? That is how they compete with a billion-dollar company. They enshrine those core values in everything they do and stay focused on delivery. Those values are what they sell. This is why they are the third-place company in the industry right now, right behind Paizo.
And the recent break between DCC and the OSR (the social media post featuring a sign reading "DCC != OSR" in the Goodman offices) was not a slight against the OSR, but a declaration that their values are what they deliver first. The OSR is a nebulous thing; there is one YouTube channel that can declare "X is OSR," and they will control your brand. If the current OSR-de-jour conflicts with the core values the company delivers, guess what? The game is not OSR and should not try to live up to outside values.
Goodman Games sells its values first.
Nobody controls who they are or what they sell.
And they have done an amazing job figuring out exactly what people want.
They sell fun based on the memories of a golden age.














